Roboguru
SD
SMP
SMA
UTBK/SNBT

SMA Bahasa Inggris: Pertanyaan, Jawaban, Latihan Soal & Pembahasan

Urutkan

Diandra D

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Genetic engineering of the human food supply is a highly contentious issue, with credentialed scientists arguing on each side. Most likely the controversy will continue. The effort by biotech companies to genetically modify food will continue to increase and resistance by consumers to genetically modified food will continue to grow. PRO: Genetic engineering is a valuable new technology that can develop more plentiful and nutritious foods, with great potential benefits for humanity and the environment, and this new scientific discovery needs to be implemented as quickly as possible for humanitarian reasons. CON: As with every new scientific technology, harmful side effects of genetic engineering are inevitable and great care should be taken in its implementation, including carefully controlled long-term tests on human health and environmental impacts. PRO: Genetic engineering is a natural extension of traditional breeding; just as conventional breeding allows us to combine valuable traits within closely related species, genetic engineering allows scientists to access genes from a broader range of organisms to produce more valuable and productive crops and livestock. CON: Genetic engineering uses artificial laboratory techniques, rather than natural reproductive mechanisms, techniques which breach natural reproductive barriers and combine genes from distant species in ways that could never occur in nature suddenly altering genetic patterns that have developed over millions of years, and greatly increasing the likelihood of unanticipated side effects. 25. Genetic engineering uses *artificial* laboratory techniques, .... The antonym of the word in italics is .... a. synthetic b. natural c. spontaneous d. genuine

62

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Jongdi J

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Genetic engineering of the human food supply is a highly contentious issue, with credentialed scientists arguing on each side. Most likely the controversy will continue. The effort by biotech companies to genetically modify food will continue to increase and resistance by consumers to genetically modified food will continue to grow. PRO: Genetic engineering is a valuable new technology that can develop more plentiful and nutritious foods, with great potential benefits for humanity and the environment, and this new scientific discovery needs to be implemented as quickly as possible for humanitarian reasons. CON: As with every new scientific technology, harmful side effects of genetic engineering are inevitable and great care should be taken in its implementation, including carefully controlled long-term tests on human health and environmental impacts. PRO: Genetic engineering is a natural extension of traditional breeding; just as conventional breeding allows us to combine valuable traits within closely related species, genetic engineering allows scientists to access genes from a broader range of organisms to produce more valuable and productive crops and livestock. CON: Genetic engineering uses artificial laboratory techniques, rather than natural reproductive mechanisms, techniques which breach natural reproductive barriers and combine genes from distant species in ways that could never occur in nature suddenly altering genetic patterns that have developed over millions of years, and greatly increasing the likelihood of unanticipated side effects. 24. Which statement is true according to the text? a. Proponents of genetic engineering say it enables the production of more abundant and nourishing foods. b. Proponents of genetic engineering say it is different from traditional breeding. c. Opponents of genetic engineering say the implementation of the technology should be ignored. d. Opponents of genetic engineering say it has no side effects.

2

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Okedia O

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Genetic engineering of the human food supply is a highly contentious issue, with credentialed scientists arguing on each side. Most likely the controversy will continue. The effort by biotech companies to genetically modify food will continue to increase and resistance by consumers to genetically modified food will continue to grow. PRO: Genetic engineering is a valuable new technology that can develop more plentiful and nutritious foods, with great potential benefits for humanity and the environment, and this new scientific discovery needs to be implemented as quickly as possible for humanitarian reasons. CON: As with every new scientific technology, harmful side effects of genetic engineering are inevitable and great care should be taken in its implementation, including carefully controlled long-term tests on human health and environmental impacts. PRO: Genetic engineering is a natural extension of traditional breeding; just as conventional breeding allows us to combine valuable traits within closely related species, genetic engineering allows scientists to access genes from a broader range of organisms to produce more valuable and productive crops and livestock. CON: Genetic engineering uses artificial laboratory techniques, rather than natural reproductive mechanisms, techniques which breach natural reproductive barriers and combine genes from distant species in ways that could never occur in nature suddenly altering genetic patterns that have developed over millions of years, and greatly increasing the likelihood of unanticipated side effects. 23. Which paragraphs are for genetic engineering? a. Paragraphs 1 and 2. b. Paragraphs 2 and 4. c. Paragraphs 3 and 5. d. Paragraphs 2 and 3.

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Bella B

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Genetic engineering of the human food supply is a highly contentious issue, with credentialed scientists arguing on each side. Most likely the controversy will continue. The effort by biotech companies to genetically modify food will continue to increase and resistance by consumers to genetically modified food will continue to grow. PRO: Genetic engineering is a valuable new technology that can develop more plentiful and nutritious foods, with great potential benefits for humanity and the environment, and this new scientific discovery needs to be implemented as quickly as possible for humanitarian reasons. CON: As with every new scientific technology, harmful side effects of genetic engineering are inevitable and great care should be taken in its implementation, including carefully controlled long-term tests on human health and environmental impacts. PRO: Genetic engineering is a natural extension of traditional breeding; just as conventional breeding allows us to combine valuable traits within closely related species, genetic engineering allows scientists to access genes from a broader range of organisms to produce more valuable and productive crops and livestock. CON: Genetic engineering uses artificial laboratory techniques, rather than natural reproductive mechanisms, techniques which breach natural reproductive barriers and combine genes from distant species in ways that could never occur in nature suddenly altering genetic patterns that have developed over millions of years, and greatly increasing the likelihood of unanticipated side effects. 22. Genetic engineering of the human food supply is a highly *contentious* issue …. The synonym of the word in italics is ... a. agreeable b. cooperative c. understanding d. controversial

5

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Diandra D

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Genetic engineering of the human food supply is a highly contentious issue, with credentialed scientists arguing on each side. Most likely the controversy will continue. The effort by biotech companies to genetically modify food will continue to increase and resistance by consumers to genetically modified food will continue to grow. PRO: Genetic engineering is a valuable new technology that can develop more plentiful and nutritious foods, with great potential benefits for humanity and the environment, and this new scientific discovery needs to be implemented as quickly as possible for humanitarian reasons. CON: As with every new scientific technology, harmful side effects of genetic engineering are inevitable and great care should be taken in its implementation, including carefully controlled long-term tests on human health and environmental impacts. PRO: Genetic engineering is a natural extension of traditional breeding; just as conventional breeding allows us to combine valuable traits within closely related species, genetic engineering allows scientists to access genes from a broader range of organisms to produce more valuable and productive crops and livestock. CON: Genetic engineering uses artificial laboratory techniques, rather than natural reproductive mechanisms, techniques which breach natural reproductive barriers and combine genes from distant species in ways that could never occur in nature suddenly altering genetic patterns that have developed over millions of years, and greatly increasing the likelihood of unanticipated side effects. 21. The most suitable title for the text is .... a. Genetic Engineering b. Genetic Engineering: the Controversy c. The Benefits of Genetic Engineering d. The Dangers of Genetic Engineering

7

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Jongdi J

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Greenhouse Effect When fossil fuels, or other fuels, such as wood or peat, which contain carbon are burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. Vehicles also give out, and so add, carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere allows most of the Sun’s rays to pass through it to heat the Earth’s surface. The Earth reflects much of the heat energy back into the atmosphere, but much of this reflected radiation cannot escape because gases such as carbon dioxide absorb it. They grow warm and send heat radiation back to Earth. This is the greenhouse effect. Many scientists think that the greenhouse effect may change the climate, over the next 100 years or so. One consequence of so-called “global warming” resulting from the greenhouse effect could be melting of the polar ice. This in turn, could lead to a rise in sea level which could flood large areas of highly populated coastal land. If carbon dioxide proves to be harmful as thought in order to reduce carbon dioxide levels we need to reduce the amounts of carbon-rich fuels burned. Taken from Kingfisher Science Encyclopedia, 1997 20. What will happen if the sea level rises? a. The polar ice will melt and make the sea get cooler. b. Some large areas of coastal land will be inundated. c. Some large areas of coastal land will be dried up. d. The surface of Earth will be flooded with water.

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Okedia O

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Greenhouse Effect When fossil fuels, or other fuels, such as wood or peat, which contain carbon are burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. Vehicles also give out, and so add, carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere allows most of the Sun’s rays to pass through it to heat the Earth’s surface. The Earth reflects much of the heat energy back into the atmosphere, but much of this reflected radiation cannot escape because gases such as carbon dioxide absorb it. They grow warm and send heat radiation back to Earth. This is the greenhouse effect. Many scientists think that the greenhouse effect may change the climate, over the next 100 years or so. One consequence of so-called “global warming” resulting from the greenhouse effect could be melting of the polar ice. This in turn, could lead to a rise in sea level which could flood large areas of highly populated coastal land. If carbon dioxide proves to be harmful as thought in order to reduce carbon dioxide levels we need to reduce the amounts of carbon-rich fuels burned. Taken from Kingfisher Science Encyclopedia, 1997 19. What causes the Earth to become warmer? a. The Sun’s rays reflected by the Earth into the atmosphere. b. The heat radiation sent back to Earth by gases that grow warm. c. Reflected radiation that escape the atmosphere. d. The burning of wood or peat.

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Bella B

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Greenhouse Effect When fossil fuels, or other fuels, such as wood or peat, which contain carbon are burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. Vehicles also give out, and so add, carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere allows most of the Sun’s rays to pass through it to heat the Earth’s surface. The Earth reflects much of the heat energy back into the atmosphere, but much of this reflected radiation cannot escape because gases such as carbon dioxide absorb it. They grow warm and send heat radiation back to Earth. This is the greenhouse effect. Many scientists think that the greenhouse effect may change the climate, over the next 100 years or so. One consequence of so-called “global warming” resulting from the greenhouse effect could be melting of the polar ice. This in turn, could lead to a rise in sea level which could flood large areas of highly populated coastal land. If carbon dioxide proves to be harmful as thought in order to reduce carbon dioxide levels we need to reduce the amounts of carbon-rich fuels burned. Taken from Kingfisher Science Encyclopedia, 1997 17. What effect does carbon dioxide have on the atmosphere? a. It makes the atmosphere darker to long-wave radiation. b. It makes the atmosphere allows most of the Sun’s rays to pass through. c. It makes the atmosphere allow most of the Sun’s rays to pass through it to heat the Earth’s surface. d. It makes the atmosphere become warmer.

2

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Diandra D

30 Juni 2022 01:28

Greenhouse Effect When fossil fuels, or other fuels, such as wood or peat, which contain carbon are burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. Vehicles also give out, and so add, carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere allows most of the Sun’s rays to pass through it to heat the Earth’s surface. The Earth reflects much of the heat energy back into the atmosphere, but much of this reflected radiation cannot escape because gases such as carbon dioxide absorb it. They grow warm and send heat radiation back to Earth. This is the greenhouse effect. Many scientists think that the greenhouse effect may change the climate, over the next 100 years or so. One consequence of so-called “global warming” resulting from the greenhouse effect could be melting of the polar ice. This in turn, could lead to a rise in sea level which could flood large areas of highly populated coastal land. If carbon dioxide proves to be harmful as thought in order to reduce carbon dioxide levels we need to reduce the amounts of carbon-rich fuels burned. Taken from Kingfisher Science Encyclopedia, 1997 16. What is flown out when fuels which contain carbon are burned? a. Carbon dioxide. b. Wood. c. Peat. d. Radiation

10

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Jongdi J

30 Juni 2022 01:27

In the beginning there lived one man and one woman, Toglai and Toglibon. Their first children were a boy and a girl. When they were old enough, the boy and the girl went far away across the waters seeking nice place to live in. Nothing more was heard of them until their children, the Spaniards and Americans, came back. After the first boy and girl left, other children were born to the couple; but they all remained at Cibolan on Mount Apo with their parents, until Toglai and Toglibon died and became spirits. Soon after that there came a great drought which lasted for three years. All the waters dried up, so that there were no rivers, and no plants could live. “Surely,” said the people, “Manama is punishing us, and we must go elsewhere to À nd food and a place to dwell in.” So they started out. Two went in the direction of the sunset, carrying with them stones from Cibolan River. After a long journey they reached a place with broad fields of cogon grass and an abundance of water, and there they made their home. Their children still live in that place and are called Magindanau, because of the stones which the couple carried when they left Cibolan. Two children of Toglai and Toglibon went to the south, seeking a home, and they carried with them a women’s baskets (baraan). When they found a good spot, they settled down. Their descendants, still dwelling at that place, are called Baraan or Bilaan, because of the women’s baskets. So two by two the children of the first couple left the land of their birth. In the place where each settled a new people developed, and thus it came about that all the tribes in the world received their names from things that the people carried out of Cibolan, or from the places where they settled. All the children left Mount Apo except two (a boy and a girl). Hunger and thirst had made them too weak to travel. One day when they were about to die the boy crawled out to the field to see if there was one living thing, and to his surprise he found a stalk of sugarcane growing lustily. He eagerly cut it, and enough water came out to refresh him and his sister until the rains came. Because of this, their children are called Bagobo. Taken from http://www.pitt.edu/ 15. Why didn’t the last two children leave Mount Apo? a. They were too weak to travel. b. They loved their land very much. c. They waited for rain falling. d. They found a stalk of sugarcane.

32

1

Jawaban terverifikasi
1927928929
Ruangguru

RUANGGURU HQ

Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru

Download di Google Play

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Download di Google PlayDownload di AppstoreDownload di App Gallery

Produk Ruangguru

Produk Lainnya

Bantuan & Panduan

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp

+62 815-7441-0000

Email info@ruangguru.com

[email protected]

Contact 02130930000

02130930000

Ikuti Kami

©2026 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia